Comment_老虎社区_美港股上老虎

kent86
2021-08-15

Comment

Why Regulatory Risk Is A Silver Lining For Apple And Google<blockquote>为什么监管风险对苹果和谷歌来说是一线希望</blockquote>

The threat of regulation has been looming over big tech giants such as Apple Inc. (NASDAQ: AAPL) and

Why Regulatory Risk Is A Silver Lining For Apple And Google<blockquote>为什么监管风险对苹果和谷歌来说是一线希望</blockquote>

免责声明：上述内容仅代表发帖人个人观点，不构成本平台的任何投资建议。

推荐
最新

暂无评论

热议股票

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"data":{"magic":2,"id":830320843,"tweetId":"830320843","gmtCreate":1629014464482,"gmtModify":1631891248576,"author":{"id":3585309771434437,"idStr":"3585309771434437","authorId":3585309771434437,"authorIdStr":"3585309771434437","name":"kent86","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7dc48996c7548ea02ca7faf6be7c3085","vip":1,"userType":1,"introduction":"","boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"fanSize":2,"starInvestorFlag":false},"themes":[],"images":[],"coverImages":[],"extraTitle":"","html":"<html><head></head><body><p>Comment</p></body></html>","htmlText":"<html><head></head><body><p>Comment</p></body></html>","text":"Comment","highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/830320843","repostId":2159321288,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2159321288","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1628990553,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2159321288?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-15 09:22","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why Regulatory Risk Is A Silver Lining For Apple And Google<blockquote>为什么监管风险对苹果和谷歌来说是一线希望</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2159321288","media":"Benzinga","summary":"The threat of regulation has been looming over big tech giants such as Apple Inc. (NASDAQ: AAPL) and","content":"<p>The threat of regulation has been looming over big tech giants such as <b>Apple Inc. </b>(NASDAQ: AAPL) and <b>Alphabet Inc. </b>(NASDAQ: GOOGL) (NASDAQ: GOOG) over the past three years.</p><p><blockquote>监管的威胁一直笼罩着大型科技巨头，例如<b>苹果公司。</b>（纳斯达克：AAPL）和<b>Alphabet公司。</b>（纳斯达克：GOOGL）（纳斯达克：GOOG）过去三年。</blockquote></p><p> With a bill seeking broader changes in the way Apple and Google operate their respective app stores introduced this week, Loup Funds Managing Partner Gene Munster offered his take on what is in store for these companies.</p><p><blockquote>随着本周推出的一项法案寻求对苹果和谷歌运营各自应用商店的方式进行更广泛的改变，Loup Funds管理合伙人吉恩·蒙斯特(Gene Munster)提出了他对这些公司未来的看法。</blockquote></p><p> <b>What the New Legislation Is All About: </b> The changes proposed by the legislation calls for allowing third-party app stores with the App Store and Google Play store, Munster noted. Both companies are also called to allow app developers to explicitly advertise within apps, so that consumers can subscribe and make purchases outside of the App Store or the Google Play Store, he added.</p><p><blockquote><b>新立法的内容是：</b>蒙斯特指出，评级立法提出的允许第三方应用商店与App Store和谷歌Play商店合作的变化。他补充说，两家公司还被要求允许应用程序开发者在应用程序内明确做广告，以便消费者可以在App Store或Google Play商店之外订阅和购买。</blockquote></p><p> This will help avoiding the 30% take rate on in-app purchases, the analyst said.</p><p><blockquote>分析师表示，这将有助于避免应用内购买30%的采用率。</blockquote></p><p> The proposed bill will have to be approved by the House and Senate before becoming law, Munster said.</p><p><blockquote>明斯特说，拟议的法案在成为法律之前必须得到众议院和参议院的批准。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Regulation Not Automatically Negative: </b> The end result of regulation is not automatically negative for big tech, given unintended consequences often occur when incentives change, Munster said.</p><p><blockquote><b>调节不自动为负：</b>蒙斯特表示，监管的最终结果不会自动对大型科技公司产生负面影响，因为当激励措施发生变化时，往往会出现意想不到的后果。</blockquote></p><p> Even if Apple buckles under pressure and reduces its take rate from 30% to 10% - a possibility which is unlikely – it could still make more money ultimately, the analyst said. A reduction in fees will likely spur greater growth in the app development ecosystem, he added.</p><p><blockquote>分析师表示，即使苹果在压力下屈服，将接受率从30%降至10%（这种可能性不太可能），它最终仍可能赚更多钱。他补充说，费用的降低可能会刺激应用程序开发生态系统的更大增长。</blockquote></p><p> Apple and Google, according to the analyst, have the stronger case, given they created their mobile app stores and are responsible for maintaining them, the analyst said. They, therefore, should have control over how things are curated and distributed within the stores, he added.</p><p><blockquote>分析师表示，苹果和谷歌拥有更强的理由，因为它们创建了自己的移动应用商店并负责维护这些商店。他补充说，因此，他们应该控制商店内商品的策划和分销方式。</blockquote></p><p> Additionally, opening the iPhone to third-party app stores, the analyst said, will weaken security and privacy, thereby harming consumers.</p><p><blockquote>此外，该分析师表示，向第三方应用商店开放iPhone将削弱安全性和隐私，从而损害消费者。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Munster's Take On Potential Regulation: </b> The likelihood of radical regulation as low, Munster said. If any regulations do&nbsp;materialize, the most likely outcome is that Apple and Google will be forced to remove their anti-steering clauses, thereby allowing publishers to advertise payment options outside of the default in-app payment systems, the analyst said.</p><p><blockquote><b>明斯特对潜在监管的看法：</b>明斯特说，激进监管的可能性很低。该分析师表示，如果任何法规真的成为现实，最有可能的结果是苹果和谷歌将被迫删除其反转向条款，从而允许出版商在默认的应用内支付系统之外宣传支付选项。</blockquote></p><p> \"This would have limited impact on consumer app store engagement given the easiest way to manage app spending will be to remain inside the respective walled gardens,\" the analyst concluded.</p><p><blockquote>这位分析师总结道：“这对消费者应用商店参与度的影响有限，因为管理应用支出最简单的方法是留在各自的围墙花园里。”</blockquote></p><p> Apple closed Friday's session down 0.14% at $149.10 and Google ended nearly flat at $2,768.12.</p><p><blockquote>苹果周五收盘下跌0.14%，至149.10美元，谷歌收盘几乎持平，至2,768.12美元。</blockquote></p><p> Latest Ratings for AAPL</p><p><blockquote>AAPL的最新评级</blockquote></p><p> <table>  <tbody>   <tr>    <th>Date</th>    <th>Firm</th>    <th>Action</th>    <th>From</th>    <th>To</th>   </tr>  </tbody>  <tbody>   <tr>    <td>Jul 2021</td>    <td>Loop Capital</td>    <td>Maintains</td>    <td></td>    <td>Buy</td>   </tr>   <tr>    <td>Jul 2021</td>    <td>Deutsche Bank</td>    <td>Maintains</td>    <td></td>    <td>Buy</td>   </tr>   <tr>    <td>Jul 2021</td>    <td>Piper Sandler</td>    <td>Maintains</td>    <td></td>    <td>Overweight</td>   </tr>  </tbody> </table></p><p><blockquote><table><tbody><tr><th>日期</th><th>公司</th><th>行动</th><th>来自</th><th>到</th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><td>2021年7月</td><td>循环资本</td><td>维护</td><td></td><td>购买</td></tr><tr><td>2021年7月</td><td>德意志银行</td><td>维护</td><td></td><td>购买</td></tr><tr><td>2021年7月</td><td>派珀·桑德勒</td><td>维护</td><td></td><td>跑赢大盘</td></tr></tbody></table></blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Regulatory Risk Is A Silver Lining For Apple And Google<blockquote>为什么监管风险对苹果和谷歌来说是一线希望</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Regulatory Risk Is A Silver Lining For Apple And Google<blockquote>为什么监管风险对苹果和谷歌来说是一线希望</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-08-15 09:22</p>\n</div>\n</div>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>The threat of regulation has been looming over big tech giants such as <b>Apple Inc. </b>(NASDAQ: AAPL) and <b>Alphabet Inc. </b>(NASDAQ: GOOGL) (NASDAQ: GOOG) over the past three years.</p><p><blockquote>监管的威胁一直笼罩着大型科技巨头，例如<b>苹果公司。</b>（纳斯达克：AAPL）和<b>Alphabet公司。</b>（纳斯达克：GOOGL）（纳斯达克：GOOG）过去三年。</blockquote></p><p> With a bill seeking broader changes in the way Apple and Google operate their respective app stores introduced this week, Loup Funds Managing Partner Gene Munster offered his take on what is in store for these companies.</p><p><blockquote>随着本周推出的一项法案寻求对苹果和谷歌运营各自应用商店的方式进行更广泛的改变，Loup Funds管理合伙人吉恩·蒙斯特(Gene Munster)提出了他对这些公司未来的看法。</blockquote></p><p> <b>What the New Legislation Is All About: </b> The changes proposed by the legislation calls for allowing third-party app stores with the App Store and Google Play store, Munster noted. Both companies are also called to allow app developers to explicitly advertise within apps, so that consumers can subscribe and make purchases outside of the App Store or the Google Play Store, he added.</p><p><blockquote><b>新立法的内容是：</b>蒙斯特指出，评级立法提出的允许第三方应用商店与App Store和谷歌Play商店合作的变化。他补充说，两家公司还被要求允许应用程序开发者在应用程序内明确做广告，以便消费者可以在App Store或Google Play商店之外订阅和购买。</blockquote></p><p> This will help avoiding the 30% take rate on in-app purchases, the analyst said.</p><p><blockquote>分析师表示，这将有助于避免应用内购买30%的采用率。</blockquote></p><p> The proposed bill will have to be approved by the House and Senate before becoming law, Munster said.</p><p><blockquote>明斯特说，拟议的法案在成为法律之前必须得到众议院和参议院的批准。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Regulation Not Automatically Negative: </b> The end result of regulation is not automatically negative for big tech, given unintended consequences often occur when incentives change, Munster said.</p><p><blockquote><b>调节不自动为负：</b>蒙斯特表示，监管的最终结果不会自动对大型科技公司产生负面影响，因为当激励措施发生变化时，往往会出现意想不到的后果。</blockquote></p><p> Even if Apple buckles under pressure and reduces its take rate from 30% to 10% - a possibility which is unlikely – it could still make more money ultimately, the analyst said. A reduction in fees will likely spur greater growth in the app development ecosystem, he added.</p><p><blockquote>分析师表示，即使苹果在压力下屈服，将接受率从30%降至10%（这种可能性不太可能），它最终仍可能赚更多钱。他补充说，费用的降低可能会刺激应用程序开发生态系统的更大增长。</blockquote></p><p> Apple and Google, according to the analyst, have the stronger case, given they created their mobile app stores and are responsible for maintaining them, the analyst said. They, therefore, should have control over how things are curated and distributed within the stores, he added.</p><p><blockquote>分析师表示，苹果和谷歌拥有更强的理由，因为它们创建了自己的移动应用商店并负责维护这些商店。他补充说，因此，他们应该控制商店内商品的策划和分销方式。</blockquote></p><p> Additionally, opening the iPhone to third-party app stores, the analyst said, will weaken security and privacy, thereby harming consumers.</p><p><blockquote>此外，该分析师表示，向第三方应用商店开放iPhone将削弱安全性和隐私，从而损害消费者。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Munster's Take On Potential Regulation: </b> The likelihood of radical regulation as low, Munster said. If any regulations do&nbsp;materialize, the most likely outcome is that Apple and Google will be forced to remove their anti-steering clauses, thereby allowing publishers to advertise payment options outside of the default in-app payment systems, the analyst said.</p><p><blockquote><b>明斯特对潜在监管的看法：</b>明斯特说，激进监管的可能性很低。该分析师表示，如果任何法规真的成为现实，最有可能的结果是苹果和谷歌将被迫删除其反转向条款，从而允许出版商在默认的应用内支付系统之外宣传支付选项。</blockquote></p><p> \"This would have limited impact on consumer app store engagement given the easiest way to manage app spending will be to remain inside the respective walled gardens,\" the analyst concluded.</p><p><blockquote>这位分析师总结道：“这对消费者应用商店参与度的影响有限，因为管理应用支出最简单的方法是留在各自的围墙花园里。”</blockquote></p><p> Apple closed Friday's session down 0.14% at $149.10 and Google ended nearly flat at $2,768.12.</p><p><blockquote>苹果周五收盘下跌0.14%，至149.10美元，谷歌收盘几乎持平，至2,768.12美元。</blockquote></p><p> Latest Ratings for AAPL</p><p><blockquote>AAPL的最新评级</blockquote></p><p> <table>  <tbody>   <tr>    <th>Date</th>    <th>Firm</th>    <th>Action</th>    <th>From</th>    <th>To</th>   </tr>  </tbody>  <tbody>   <tr>    <td>Jul 2021</td>    <td>Loop Capital</td>    <td>Maintains</td>    <td></td>    <td>Buy</td>   </tr>   <tr>    <td>Jul 2021</td>    <td>Deutsche Bank</td>    <td>Maintains</td>    <td></td>    <td>Buy</td>   </tr>   <tr>    <td>Jul 2021</td>    <td>Piper Sandler</td>    <td>Maintains</td>    <td></td>    <td>Overweight</td>   </tr>  </tbody> </table></p><p><blockquote><table><tbody><tr><th>日期</th><th>公司</th><th>行动</th><th>来自</th><th>到</th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><td>2021年7月</td><td>循环资本</td><td>维护</td><td></td><td>购买</td></tr><tr><td>2021年7月</td><td>德意志银行</td><td>维护</td><td></td><td>购买</td></tr><tr><td>2021年7月</td><td>派珀·桑德勒</td><td>维护</td><td></td><td>跑赢大盘</td></tr></tbody></table></blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果","GOOGL":"谷歌A","GOOG":"谷歌"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2159321288","content_text":"The threat of regulation has been looming over big tech giants such as Apple Inc. (NASDAQ: AAPL) and Alphabet Inc. (NASDAQ: GOOGL) (NASDAQ: GOOG) over the past three years.\nWith a bill seeking broader changes in the way Apple and Google operate their respective app stores introduced this week, Loup Funds Managing Partner Gene Munster offered his take on what is in store for these companies.\nWhat the New Legislation Is All About:  The changes proposed by the legislation calls for allowing third-party app stores with the App Store and Google Play store, Munster noted. Both companies are also called to allow app developers to explicitly advertise within apps, so that consumers can subscribe and make purchases outside of the App Store or the Google Play Store, he added.\nThis will help avoiding the 30% take rate on in-app purchases, the analyst said.\nThe proposed bill will have to be approved by the House and Senate before becoming law, Munster said.\nRegulation Not Automatically Negative:  The end result of regulation is not automatically negative for big tech, given unintended consequences often occur when incentives change, Munster said.\nEven if Apple buckles under pressure and reduces its take rate from 30% to 10% - a possibility which is unlikely – it could still make more money ultimately, the analyst said. A reduction in fees will likely spur greater growth in the app development ecosystem, he added.\nApple and Google, according to the analyst, have the stronger case, given they created their mobile app stores and are responsible for maintaining them, the analyst said. They, therefore, should have control over how things are curated and distributed within the stores, he added.\nAdditionally, opening the iPhone to third-party app stores, the analyst said, will weaken security and privacy, thereby harming consumers.\nMunster's Take On Potential Regulation:  The likelihood of radical regulation as low, Munster said. If any regulations do materialize, the most likely outcome is that Apple and Google will be forced to remove their anti-steering clauses, thereby allowing publishers to advertise payment options outside of the default in-app payment systems, the analyst said.\n\"This would have limited impact on consumer app store engagement given the easiest way to manage app spending will be to remain inside the respective walled gardens,\" the analyst concluded.\nApple closed Friday's session down 0.14% at $149.10 and Google ended nearly flat at $2,768.12.\nLatest Ratings for AAPL\n\n\n\nDate\nFirm\nAction\nFrom\nTo\n\n\n\n\nJul 2021\nLoop Capital\nMaintains\n\nBuy\n\n\nJul 2021\nDeutsche Bank\nMaintains\n\nBuy\n\n\nJul 2021\nPiper Sandler\nMaintains\n\nOverweight","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"GOOG":0.9,"AAPL":0.9,"GOOGL":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2116,"commentLimit":10,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"symbols":[],"verified":2,"subType":0,"readableState":1,"langContent":"EN","currentLanguage":"EN","warmUpFlag":false,"orderFlag":false,"shareable":true,"causeOfNotShareable":"","featuresForAnalytics":[],"commentAndTweetFlag":false,"andRepostAutoSelectedFlag":false,"upFlag":false,"length":7,"xxTargetLangEnum":"ORIG"},"commentList":[],"hasMoreComment":false,"orderType":2}

Why Regulatory Risk Is A Silver Lining For Apple And Google<blockquote>为什么监管风险对苹果和谷歌来说是一线希望</blockquote>

评论（2）

热议股票