个人中心 - 老虎社区

Weilonglek

IP属地：未知

帖子 · 175帖子 · 175
关注 · 0关注 · 0
粉丝 · 0粉丝 · 0

- WeilonglekWeilonglek
  ·2021-08-10
  Gogogo
  非常抱歉，此主贴已删除
  721 1
  6
  分享
  举报
- WeilonglekWeilonglek
  ·2021-08-09
  Okay
  非常抱歉，此主贴已删除
  823 评论
  6
  分享
  举报
- WeilonglekWeilonglek
  ·2021-08-05
  Ok
  Coursera fell 3% after soaring 21% yesterday
  (Aug 5) Coursera fell 3% after soaring 21% yesterday. the company have reported Q2 2021 financial r
  Coursera fell 3% after soaring 21% yesterday
  559 评论
  3
  分享
  举报
- WeilonglekWeilonglek
  ·2021-08-04
  Good
  非常抱歉，此主贴已删除
  605 评论
  4
  分享
  举报
- WeilonglekWeilonglek
  ·2021-08-03
  Ok
  Fed Could Start ‘Tapering’ Soon. Don’t Expect It to Cause Havoc for the Stock Market This Time Around.
  The Federal Reserve is poised to reduce the size of its bond-buying program, so stocks could head lo
  Fed Could Start ‘Tapering’ Soon. Don’t Expect It to Cause Havoc for the Stock Market This Time Around.
  426 1
  5
  分享
  举报
- WeilonglekWeilonglek
  ·2021-08-02
  Let’s work on it
  非常抱歉，此主贴已删除
  515 评论
  3
  分享
  举报
- WeilonglekWeilonglek
  ·2021-07-31
  Ok
  SGD to weaken to $1.35/USD amidst COVID-19 woes: Fitch
  The Singapore dollar (SGD) is expected to weaken to $1.35 versus the US dollar (USD) for 2021, accor
  SGD to weaken to $1.35/USD amidst COVID-19 woes: Fitch
  669 1
  1
  分享
  举报
- WeilonglekWeilonglek
  ·2021-07-30
  Gogogo
  非常抱歉，此主贴已删除
  815 评论
  3
  分享
  举报
- WeilonglekWeilonglek
  ·2021-07-30
  Nice
  非常抱歉，此主贴已删除
  820 评论
  1
  分享
  举报
- WeilonglekWeilonglek
  ·2021-07-28
  Okay
  Uber Technologies Delivers People and Packages But Not Profits
  Once a ride-hailing disruptor, the firm is growing in delivery… if it can find people to do the work
  Uber Technologies Delivers People and Packages But Not Profits
  655 1
  1
  分享
  举报
暂无粉丝

热议股票

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"isCurrentUser":false,"userPageInfo":{"id":"3558571642509864","uuid":"3558571642509864","gmtCreate":1595480044181,"gmtModify":1613051062055,"name":"Weilonglek","pinyin":"weilonglek","introduction":"","introductionEn":null,"signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/582a828478fa487580669c34bce8961c","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":14,"headSize":332,"tweetSize":175,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":1,"name":"萌萌虎","nameTw":"萌萌虎","represent":"呱呱坠地","factor":"评论帖子3次或发布1条主帖（非转发）","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":null,"userBadges":[{"badgeId":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37-1","templateUuid":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37","name":"博闻投资者","description":"累计交易超过10只正股","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},{"badgeId":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a-1","templateUuid":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a","name":"实盘交易者","description":"完成一笔实盘交易","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969-2","templateUuid":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969","name":"宗师交易员","description":"证券或期货账户累计交易次数达到100次","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad22cfbe2d05aa393b18e9226e4b0307","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/36702e6ff3ffe46acafee66cc85273ca","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d52eb88fa385cf5abe2616ed63781765","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":"80.10%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561-1","templateUuid":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561","name":"出道虎友","description":"加入老虎社区500天","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0e4d0ca1da0456dc7894c946d44bf9ab","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0f2f65e8ce4cfaae8db2bea9b127f58b","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5948a31b6edf154422335b265235809","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.20","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001}],"userBadgeCount":4,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":"未知","starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"page":1,"watchlist":null,"tweetList":[{"id":896704236,"gmtCreate":1628604041125,"gmtModify":1631889005481,"author":{"id":"3558571642509864","authorId":"3558571642509864","name":"Weilonglek","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/582a828478fa487580669c34bce8961c","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3558571642509864","idStr":"3558571642509864"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Gogogo","listText":"Gogogo","text":"Gogogo","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/896704236","repostId":"2158479992","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":721,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":898790475,"gmtCreate":1628520211997,"gmtModify":1631889005483,"author":{"id":"3558571642509864","authorId":"3558571642509864","name":"Weilonglek","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/582a828478fa487580669c34bce8961c","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3558571642509864","idStr":"3558571642509864"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Okay","listText":"Okay","text":"Okay","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/898790475","repostId":"2158444273","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":823,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":899836383,"gmtCreate":1628172686642,"gmtModify":1631889005483,"author":{"id":"3558571642509864","authorId":"3558571642509864","name":"Weilonglek","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/582a828478fa487580669c34bce8961c","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3558571642509864","idStr":"3558571642509864"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/899836383","repostId":"1132594719","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1132594719","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1628171470,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1132594719?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-05 21:51","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Coursera fell 3% after soaring 21% yesterday","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1132594719","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"(Aug 5) Coursera fell 3% after soaring 21% yesterday. \nthe company have reported Q2 2021 financial r","content":"<p>(Aug 5)&nbsp;Coursera fell 3% after soaring 21% yesterday.&nbsp;</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b4c30f620d3324d65c0c18c0207d5830\" tg-width=\"1129\" tg-height=\"653\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">the company have&nbsp;reported Q2 2021 financial results that look \"mixed\" in the extreme&nbsp;yesterday&nbsp;.</p>\n<p>On the one hand, Coursera blew away analyst targets for Q2 revenue, producing $102.1 million where Wall Street had expected only $91.5 million. On the other hand, though, Coursera appears to have missed analyst predictions on profit entirely. According to a writeup fromTheFly.comthis morning, instead of the predicted $0.11-per-share loss, Coursera lost $0.38 per share.</p>\n<p>Wait, what? Coursera lost three times as much money as it was \"supposed\" to, and its stock is going up? At first glance, it certainly does look that way. So let me unravel the mystery for you.</p>\n<p>When analysts make earnings estimates, they most often refer not to earnings calculated according to generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) but rather topro formaearnings. And this fact can create some confusion among investors around earnings time as to whether a company \"beat\" or \"missed\" earnings.</p>\n<p>So in the case of Coursera, analysts forecast that the company would lose $0.11 per share<i>pro forma.</i>But the earnings number TheFly and other financial outlets refer to -- the $0.38-per-share loss -- was the company's<i>GAAP</i>loss. If you back out all the one-time charges (or what analysts consider one-time charges) from Coursera's results, though, the company's<i>pro forma</i>loss for the quarter was only $0.05 per share.</p>\n<p>Or in other words, comparing apples to apples, this was not an earnings \"miss,\" but an earnings \"beat.\"</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Coursera fell 3% after soaring 21% yesterday</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nCoursera fell 3% after soaring 21% yesterday\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-08-05 21:51</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>(Aug 5)&nbsp;Coursera fell 3% after soaring 21% yesterday.&nbsp;</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b4c30f620d3324d65c0c18c0207d5830\" tg-width=\"1129\" tg-height=\"653\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">the company have&nbsp;reported Q2 2021 financial results that look \"mixed\" in the extreme&nbsp;yesterday&nbsp;.</p>\n<p>On the one hand, Coursera blew away analyst targets for Q2 revenue, producing $102.1 million where Wall Street had expected only $91.5 million. On the other hand, though, Coursera appears to have missed analyst predictions on profit entirely. According to a writeup fromTheFly.comthis morning, instead of the predicted $0.11-per-share loss, Coursera lost $0.38 per share.</p>\n<p>Wait, what? Coursera lost three times as much money as it was \"supposed\" to, and its stock is going up? At first glance, it certainly does look that way. So let me unravel the mystery for you.</p>\n<p>When analysts make earnings estimates, they most often refer not to earnings calculated according to generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) but rather topro formaearnings. And this fact can create some confusion among investors around earnings time as to whether a company \"beat\" or \"missed\" earnings.</p>\n<p>So in the case of Coursera, analysts forecast that the company would lose $0.11 per share<i>pro forma.</i>But the earnings number TheFly and other financial outlets refer to -- the $0.38-per-share loss -- was the company's<i>GAAP</i>loss. If you back out all the one-time charges (or what analysts consider one-time charges) from Coursera's results, though, the company's<i>pro forma</i>loss for the quarter was only $0.05 per share.</p>\n<p>Or in other words, comparing apples to apples, this was not an earnings \"miss,\" but an earnings \"beat.\"</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"COUR":"Coursera, Inc."},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1132594719","content_text":"(Aug 5) Coursera fell 3% after soaring 21% yesterday. \nthe company have reported Q2 2021 financial results that look \"mixed\" in the extreme yesterday .\nOn the one hand, Coursera blew away analyst targets for Q2 revenue, producing $102.1 million where Wall Street had expected only $91.5 million. On the other hand, though, Coursera appears to have missed analyst predictions on profit entirely. According to a writeup fromTheFly.comthis morning, instead of the predicted $0.11-per-share loss, Coursera lost $0.38 per share.\nWait, what? Coursera lost three times as much money as it was \"supposed\" to, and its stock is going up? At first glance, it certainly does look that way. So let me unravel the mystery for you.\nWhen analysts make earnings estimates, they most often refer not to earnings calculated according to generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) but rather topro formaearnings. And this fact can create some confusion among investors around earnings time as to whether a company \"beat\" or \"missed\" earnings.\nSo in the case of Coursera, analysts forecast that the company would lose $0.11 per sharepro forma.But the earnings number TheFly and other financial outlets refer to -- the $0.38-per-share loss -- was the company'sGAAPloss. If you back out all the one-time charges (or what analysts consider one-time charges) from Coursera's results, though, the company'spro formaloss for the quarter was only $0.05 per share.\nOr in other words, comparing apples to apples, this was not an earnings \"miss,\" but an earnings \"beat.\"","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":559,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":890131246,"gmtCreate":1628086252685,"gmtModify":1631889005489,"author":{"id":"3558571642509864","authorId":"3558571642509864","name":"Weilonglek","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/582a828478fa487580669c34bce8961c","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3558571642509864","idStr":"3558571642509864"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/890131246","repostId":"1187165636","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":605,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":807368161,"gmtCreate":1628001040453,"gmtModify":1631889005490,"author":{"id":"3558571642509864","authorId":"3558571642509864","name":"Weilonglek","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/582a828478fa487580669c34bce8961c","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3558571642509864","idStr":"3558571642509864"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/807368161","repostId":"1145562808","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1145562808","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1628000397,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1145562808?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-03 22:19","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Fed Could Start ‘Tapering’ Soon. Don’t Expect It to Cause Havoc for the Stock Market This Time Around.","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1145562808","media":"Barron's","summary":"The Federal Reserve is poised to reduce the size of its bond-buying program, so stocks could head lo","content":"<p>The Federal Reserve is poised to reduce the size of its bond-buying program, so stocks could head lower soon. The pain may not be acute, though, because investors generally expect the Fed to do just that.</p>\n<p>It was a different scenario in May 2013, when Ben Bernanke, the Fed’s chief at the time, told Congress that if economic conditions kept improving, and policy makers were confident that would continue, the bank could pare back its buying. Bond yields leapt, and the S&amp;P 500 fell 5% in a five-day stretch in an episode known&nbsp;as the Taper Tantrum.</p>\n<p>As bond yields rose, stocks became relatively less attractive, especially because the bank was signaling it would provide less support to markets and the economy. The Fed ultimately announced a reduction of its buying in December that year.</p>\n<p>This time, investors are already expecting the Fed to taper. The central bank has telegraphed the change in monetary policy on several occasions. Government- bond dealers expect the Fed’s monthly bond purchases, part of its effort to prop up the economy as the pandemic struck, to fall from $120 billion currently to zero by the start of 2023, according to a Goldman Sachs survey.</p>\n<p>Stocks are already valued in a way that makes higher bond yields seem plausible. The S&amp;P 500’s equity-risk premium—the percentage return from earnings and dividends for the average stock on the index, minus the yield on 10-year Treasury debt, is currently at about 6 percentage points, according to Goldman Sachs. The number represents the extra return relative to safe bonds that investors demand for being in equities.</p>\n<p>The figure is higher than the sub 6% levels often seen since 2010, implying that even if bond yields move higher, narrowing the equity-risk premium, stocks would still offer relatively strong returns in historical terms. “Market participants appear aware of tapering,” writes David Kostin, chief U.S. equity strategist at Goldman Sachs. “The equity risk premium remains high versus history.”</p>\n<p>Others agree that markets are pricing in tapering by the Fed. “An orderly and transparent removal of easy monetary policy should not be disruptive, particularly if it’s undertaken in reaction to improvements in the underlying economy, “ wrote Jason Pride, chief investment officer for private wealth at Glenmede.</p>\n<p>At the very least, investors should monitor how much money the Fed pulls out from the bond market and how quickly it does so. A sharp selloff in response to the simple news that the Fed is tapering is far from certain.</p>","source":"lsy1610680873436","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Fed Could Start ‘Tapering’ Soon. Don’t Expect It to Cause Havoc for the Stock Market This Time Around.</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFed Could Start ‘Tapering’ Soon. Don’t Expect It to Cause Havoc for the Stock Market This Time Around.\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-08-03 22:19 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/federal-reserve-stocks-tapering-51627939038?mod=hp_LEAD_2_B_1><strong>Barron's</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The Federal Reserve is poised to reduce the size of its bond-buying program, so stocks could head lower soon. The pain may not be acute, though, because investors generally expect the Fed to do just ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/federal-reserve-stocks-tapering-51627939038?mod=hp_LEAD_2_B_1\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/federal-reserve-stocks-tapering-51627939038?mod=hp_LEAD_2_B_1","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1145562808","content_text":"The Federal Reserve is poised to reduce the size of its bond-buying program, so stocks could head lower soon. The pain may not be acute, though, because investors generally expect the Fed to do just that.\nIt was a different scenario in May 2013, when Ben Bernanke, the Fed’s chief at the time, told Congress that if economic conditions kept improving, and policy makers were confident that would continue, the bank could pare back its buying. Bond yields leapt, and the S&P 500 fell 5% in a five-day stretch in an episode known as the Taper Tantrum.\nAs bond yields rose, stocks became relatively less attractive, especially because the bank was signaling it would provide less support to markets and the economy. The Fed ultimately announced a reduction of its buying in December that year.\nThis time, investors are already expecting the Fed to taper. The central bank has telegraphed the change in monetary policy on several occasions. Government- bond dealers expect the Fed’s monthly bond purchases, part of its effort to prop up the economy as the pandemic struck, to fall from $120 billion currently to zero by the start of 2023, according to a Goldman Sachs survey.\nStocks are already valued in a way that makes higher bond yields seem plausible. The S&P 500’s equity-risk premium—the percentage return from earnings and dividends for the average stock on the index, minus the yield on 10-year Treasury debt, is currently at about 6 percentage points, according to Goldman Sachs. The number represents the extra return relative to safe bonds that investors demand for being in equities.\nThe figure is higher than the sub 6% levels often seen since 2010, implying that even if bond yields move higher, narrowing the equity-risk premium, stocks would still offer relatively strong returns in historical terms. “Market participants appear aware of tapering,” writes David Kostin, chief U.S. equity strategist at Goldman Sachs. “The equity risk premium remains high versus history.”\nOthers agree that markets are pricing in tapering by the Fed. “An orderly and transparent removal of easy monetary policy should not be disruptive, particularly if it’s undertaken in reaction to improvements in the underlying economy, “ wrote Jason Pride, chief investment officer for private wealth at Glenmede.\nAt the very least, investors should monitor how much money the Fed pulls out from the bond market and how quickly it does so. A sharp selloff in response to the simple news that the Fed is tapering is far from certain.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":426,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":804974842,"gmtCreate":1627918906786,"gmtModify":1631889005494,"author":{"id":"3558571642509864","authorId":"3558571642509864","name":"Weilonglek","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/582a828478fa487580669c34bce8961c","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3558571642509864","idStr":"3558571642509864"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Let’s work on it","listText":"Let’s work on it","text":"Let’s work on it","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/804974842","repostId":"1172320411","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":515,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":802143238,"gmtCreate":1627740267224,"gmtModify":1631889005502,"author":{"id":"3558571642509864","authorId":"3558571642509864","name":"Weilonglek","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/582a828478fa487580669c34bce8961c","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3558571642509864","idStr":"3558571642509864"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/802143238","repostId":"1167653033","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1167653033","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1627706886,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1167653033?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-31 12:48","market":"sg","language":"en","title":"SGD to weaken to $1.35/USD amidst COVID-19 woes: Fitch","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1167653033","media":"Singapore Business","summary":"The Singapore dollar (SGD) is expected to weaken to $1.35 versus the US dollar (USD) for 2021, accor","content":"<p>The Singapore dollar (SGD) is expected to weaken to $1.35 versus the US dollar (USD) for 2021, according to Fitch Solutions, to weaken further to $1.36 in 2022.</p>\n<p>This is a downgrade from its previous forecast of $1.33 against the greenback for 2021 and $1.32 in 2022.</p>\n<p>“The SGD has weakened in line with most other Asian currencies after the Fed’s hawkish surprise on June 16, and will likely trade in a weaker range between $1.35 per USD and $1.38 per USD for the remainder of 2021 and likely in 2022 as well,” Fitch said.</p>\n<p>This is due to the risk-off sentiment sparked by the resurgence of COVID-19 infections across Asia, including the key economies of Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand.</p>\n<p>The SGD&nbsp;also breached the key support level of $1.35 per USD on 8 July and has weakened since. The last time Singapore breached this level was in July 2018, during the initial phases of the US-China trade war.</p>\n<p>“However, any weakness in the SGD should be capped by the economy being in a much more resilient position than other Asian markets, due to the fast progress in vaccinating the population,” it added. “This puts Singapore in a much more resilient position compared to most other Asian economies and the SGD could benefit from some degree of safe-haven flows from elsewhere in the region as the year progresses, limiting prospects for further depreciation beyond our identified trading range.”</p>\n<p>For the long term, Fitch expects a strong recovery in exports to support the currency in 2022, but balanced by the risk of a potentially more hawkish US Fed if above-2% target inflation persists.</p>\n<p>Fitch Solutions identified as a key risk the possibility of a COVID-19 variant that can bypass existing vaccines, which could force Singapore to implement further lockdowns.</p>","source":"lsy1618986048053","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>SGD to weaken to $1.35/USD amidst COVID-19 woes: Fitch</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSGD to weaken to $1.35/USD amidst COVID-19 woes: Fitch\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-31 12:48 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://sbr.com.sg/economy/in-focus/sgd-weaken-135usd-amidst-covid-19-woes-fitch><strong>Singapore Business</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The Singapore dollar (SGD) is expected to weaken to $1.35 versus the US dollar (USD) for 2021, according to Fitch Solutions, to weaken further to $1.36 in 2022.\nThis is a downgrade from its previous ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://sbr.com.sg/economy/in-focus/sgd-weaken-135usd-amidst-covid-19-woes-fitch\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"STI.SI":"富时新加坡海峡指数"},"source_url":"https://sbr.com.sg/economy/in-focus/sgd-weaken-135usd-amidst-covid-19-woes-fitch","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1167653033","content_text":"The Singapore dollar (SGD) is expected to weaken to $1.35 versus the US dollar (USD) for 2021, according to Fitch Solutions, to weaken further to $1.36 in 2022.\nThis is a downgrade from its previous forecast of $1.33 against the greenback for 2021 and $1.32 in 2022.\n“The SGD has weakened in line with most other Asian currencies after the Fed’s hawkish surprise on June 16, and will likely trade in a weaker range between $1.35 per USD and $1.38 per USD for the remainder of 2021 and likely in 2022 as well,” Fitch said.\nThis is due to the risk-off sentiment sparked by the resurgence of COVID-19 infections across Asia, including the key economies of Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand.\nThe SGD also breached the key support level of $1.35 per USD on 8 July and has weakened since. The last time Singapore breached this level was in July 2018, during the initial phases of the US-China trade war.\n“However, any weakness in the SGD should be capped by the economy being in a much more resilient position than other Asian markets, due to the fast progress in vaccinating the population,” it added. “This puts Singapore in a much more resilient position compared to most other Asian economies and the SGD could benefit from some degree of safe-haven flows from elsewhere in the region as the year progresses, limiting prospects for further depreciation beyond our identified trading range.”\nFor the long term, Fitch expects a strong recovery in exports to support the currency in 2022, but balanced by the risk of a potentially more hawkish US Fed if above-2% target inflation persists.\nFitch Solutions identified as a key risk the possibility of a COVID-19 variant that can bypass existing vaccines, which could force Singapore to implement further lockdowns.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":669,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":806650922,"gmtCreate":1627654538666,"gmtModify":1631889005503,"author":{"id":"3558571642509864","authorId":"3558571642509864","name":"Weilonglek","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/582a828478fa487580669c34bce8961c","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3558571642509864","idStr":"3558571642509864"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Gogogo","listText":"Gogogo","text":"Gogogo","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/806650922","repostId":"2155415366","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":815,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":808662633,"gmtCreate":1627574523322,"gmtModify":1631889005505,"author":{"id":"3558571642509864","authorId":"3558571642509864","name":"Weilonglek","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/582a828478fa487580669c34bce8961c","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3558571642509864","idStr":"3558571642509864"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nice","listText":"Nice","text":"Nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/808662633","repostId":"2155901523","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":820,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":801995099,"gmtCreate":1627478282411,"gmtModify":1631889005513,"author":{"id":"3558571642509864","authorId":"3558571642509864","name":"Weilonglek","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/582a828478fa487580669c34bce8961c","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3558571642509864","idStr":"3558571642509864"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Okay","listText":"Okay","text":"Okay","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/801995099","repostId":"1100196347","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1100196347","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1627477398,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1100196347?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-28 21:03","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Uber Technologies Delivers People and Packages But Not Profits","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1100196347","media":"InvestorPlace","summary":"Once a ride-hailing disruptor, the firm is growing in delivery… if it can find people to do the work","content":"<p>It’s an old joke: Call me a taxi. OK, you’re a taxi. (<i>rimshot</i>) But what’s not a taxi?<b>Uber Technologies</b>(NYSE:<b><u>UBER</u></b>). Today’s Uber is a different beast from the ride-hailing firm that first offered stock on the New York Stock Exchange at $42 a share in May 2019.</p>\n<p>More than two years later, Uber stock closed July 27 at $45.82 a share. That’s a market cap of about $86 billion. It is doing all sorts of delivery — restaurants, groceries, even freight.</p>\n<p>What hasn’t changed is its lack of profit. Uber expects to report&nbsp;a loss of 54 cents a share&nbsp;on Aug 4, on $3.73 billion of revenue. During the March quarter it lost 6 cents a share&nbsp;on revenue of $2.9 billion.</p>\n<p><b>Acquisitions Stoke Growth</b></p>\n<p>It’s hard to make earnings comparisons because Uber has been seeking so much growth from acquisitions.</p>\n<p>Its latest buy is&nbsp;<b>Transact</b>, a freight logistics company, which it’s buying from private equity&nbsp;for $2.25 billion.That includes $1.5 billion of debt, based on its March report, which would bring the total over $9 billion, against $5.6 billion in cash and short-term investments.</p>\n<p>This goes on top of it’s buying the rest of Cornershop, a grocery delivery service mainly serving Latin America. That cost&nbsp;29 million new shares of stock, worth about $1.35 billion at today’s prices. In 2020 Uber paid $2.65 billion for&nbsp;<b>Postmates</b>, a restaurant delivery service competing with&nbsp;<b>Uber Eats</b>. It also paid $1.1 billion for&nbsp;<b>Drizzly</b>, an alcohol delivery startup.</p>\n<p>This has made Uber the biggest competitor to&nbsp;<b>DoorDash</b>(NYSE:<b><u>DASH</u></b>), which came public late last year and now has a market cap of $58.6 billion. Uber talks about “synergies” from its acquisitions but&nbsp;it keeps falling behind DoorDash, which prefers to grow&nbsp;organically.</p>\n<p><b>Savior CEO Faces Tough Fights</b></p>\n<p>Today’s Uber is the creation of Dara Khosrowshahi, the former CEO of&nbsp;<b>Expedia</b>(NASDAQ:<b><u>EXPE</u></b>). He has been running Uber for about four years now, brought in to save the then-pre IPO firm from the&nbsp;travails of founder Travis Kalanick. That’s enough time to get&nbsp;admiring portraits&nbsp;of himself done by political reporter Maureen Dowd. But Khosrowshahi has as many political problems as his predecessor did.</p>\n<p>Along with competitor&nbsp;<b>Lyft</b>(NASDAQ:<b><u>LYFT</u></b>), Uber just took a one-day strike of drivers&nbsp;upset over pay and working conditions.Uber won its expensive fight for California’s Proposition 22, classifying its drivers as contractors, last year.</p>\n<p>But while Uber can dictate working conditions, that doesn’t mean it can get help. Two-hour wait times and $100 fares from major airports are&nbsp;becoming common.Drivers are getting&nbsp;a little over half&nbsp;that money. Uber is&nbsp;sharing more of its data&nbsp;with them, but that’s all. It’s certainly&nbsp;doing little to keep them safe.&nbsp;</p>\n<p>Instead, Uber is getting more heavily into delivering goods. In addition to its many acquisitions it has lined up&nbsp;a grocery delivery pilot&nbsp;with&nbsp;<b>Costco Wholesale</b>(NASDAQ:<b><u>COST</u></b>). It’s also focusing more on&nbsp;its global footprint. Even that was hurt by the post-IPO collapse of&nbsp;<b>DiDi Global</b>(NASDAQ:<b><u>DIDI</u></b>), the so-called “Chinese Uber,”which cost it $2 billion.</p>\n<p><b>The Bottom Line on UBER stock</b></p>\n<p>Uber has always claimed to have a bright future offsetting a troubled present, using technology to arbitrage around labor costs.</p>\n<p>That’s still the story with UBER stock.</p>\n<p>It will take more than New York Times columnist Dowd’s appreciation, however, to turn Uber’s numbers around. The 20 analysts covering expect it to have&nbsp;revenues of $22.2 billion this year. That means you’re paying four times revenue for a string of losses.</p>\n<p>Whether Uber can do better moving goods instead of people still depends on it getting people to do the work. The hardball tactics it used when labor was abundant are backfiring now that labor is dear.</p>\n<p>Uber bulls expect the company to become&nbsp;profitable in 2023, based on&nbsp;revenue growth of 68% per year. I don’t buy it unless the supply-demand curve for labor changes drastically.</p>","source":"lsy1606302653667","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Uber Technologies Delivers People and Packages But Not Profits</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nUber Technologies Delivers People and Packages But Not Profits\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-28 21:03 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/2021/07/uber-technologies-delivers-people-food-and-packages-just-not-profits/><strong>InvestorPlace</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>It’s an old joke: Call me a taxi. OK, you’re a taxi. (rimshot) But what’s not a taxi?Uber Technologies(NYSE:UBER). Today’s Uber is a different beast from the ride-hailing firm that first offered stock...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2021/07/uber-technologies-delivers-people-food-and-packages-just-not-profits/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"UBER":"优步"},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2021/07/uber-technologies-delivers-people-food-and-packages-just-not-profits/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1100196347","content_text":"It’s an old joke: Call me a taxi. OK, you’re a taxi. (rimshot) But what’s not a taxi?Uber Technologies(NYSE:UBER). Today’s Uber is a different beast from the ride-hailing firm that first offered stock on the New York Stock Exchange at $42 a share in May 2019.\nMore than two years later, Uber stock closed July 27 at $45.82 a share. That’s a market cap of about $86 billion. It is doing all sorts of delivery — restaurants, groceries, even freight.\nWhat hasn’t changed is its lack of profit. Uber expects to report a loss of 54 cents a share on Aug 4, on $3.73 billion of revenue. During the March quarter it lost 6 cents a share on revenue of $2.9 billion.\nAcquisitions Stoke Growth\nIt’s hard to make earnings comparisons because Uber has been seeking so much growth from acquisitions.\nIts latest buy is Transact, a freight logistics company, which it’s buying from private equity for $2.25 billion.That includes $1.5 billion of debt, based on its March report, which would bring the total over $9 billion, against $5.6 billion in cash and short-term investments.\nThis goes on top of it’s buying the rest of Cornershop, a grocery delivery service mainly serving Latin America. That cost 29 million new shares of stock, worth about $1.35 billion at today’s prices. In 2020 Uber paid $2.65 billion for Postmates, a restaurant delivery service competing with Uber Eats. It also paid $1.1 billion for Drizzly, an alcohol delivery startup.\nThis has made Uber the biggest competitor to DoorDash(NYSE:DASH), which came public late last year and now has a market cap of $58.6 billion. Uber talks about “synergies” from its acquisitions but it keeps falling behind DoorDash, which prefers to grow organically.\nSavior CEO Faces Tough Fights\nToday’s Uber is the creation of Dara Khosrowshahi, the former CEO of Expedia(NASDAQ:EXPE). He has been running Uber for about four years now, brought in to save the then-pre IPO firm from the travails of founder Travis Kalanick. That’s enough time to get admiring portraits of himself done by political reporter Maureen Dowd. But Khosrowshahi has as many political problems as his predecessor did.\nAlong with competitor Lyft(NASDAQ:LYFT), Uber just took a one-day strike of drivers upset over pay and working conditions.Uber won its expensive fight for California’s Proposition 22, classifying its drivers as contractors, last year.\nBut while Uber can dictate working conditions, that doesn’t mean it can get help. Two-hour wait times and $100 fares from major airports are becoming common.Drivers are getting a little over half that money. Uber is sharing more of its data with them, but that’s all. It’s certainly doing little to keep them safe. \nInstead, Uber is getting more heavily into delivering goods. In addition to its many acquisitions it has lined up a grocery delivery pilot with Costco Wholesale(NASDAQ:COST). It’s also focusing more on its global footprint. Even that was hurt by the post-IPO collapse of DiDi Global(NASDAQ:DIDI), the so-called “Chinese Uber,”which cost it $2 billion.\nThe Bottom Line on UBER stock\nUber has always claimed to have a bright future offsetting a troubled present, using technology to arbitrage around labor costs.\nThat’s still the story with UBER stock.\nIt will take more than New York Times columnist Dowd’s appreciation, however, to turn Uber’s numbers around. The 20 analysts covering expect it to have revenues of $22.2 billion this year. That means you’re paying four times revenue for a string of losses.\nWhether Uber can do better moving goods instead of people still depends on it getting people to do the work. The hardball tactics it used when labor was abundant are backfiring now that labor is dear.\nUber bulls expect the company to become profitable in 2023, based on revenue growth of 68% per year. I don’t buy it unless the supply-demand curve for labor changes drastically.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":655,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"defaultTab":"followers","isTTM":false}