个人中心 - 老虎社区

Xestar

IP属地：未知

帖子 · 6帖子 · 6
关注 · 0关注 · 0
粉丝 · 0粉丝 · 0

- XestarXestar
  ·2021-07-11
  GL
  非常抱歉，此主贴已删除
  256 评论
  5
  分享
  举报
- XestarXestar
  ·2021-06-22
  [微笑]
  Powell Just Launched $2 Trillion In "Heat-Seeking Missiles": Zoltan Explains How The Fed Started The Next Repo Crisis
  Last week, amid thefire and brimstone surroundingthe market's shocked response to the Fed's unexpect
  Powell Just Launched $2 Trillion In "Heat-Seeking Missiles": Zoltan Explains How The Fed Started The Next Repo Crisis
  869 评论
  1
  分享
  举报
- XestarXestar
  ·2021-06-18
  Wow o.0
  CAI shares soared nearly 45% in pre-market，as it has agreed to a $1.1 billion takeover by Mitsubishi HC Capital Inc.
  CAI shares soared nearly 45% in pre-market，as it has agreed to a $1.1 billion takeover by Mitsubishi
  CAI shares soared nearly 45% in pre-market，as it has agreed to a $1.1 billion takeover by Mitsubishi HC Capital Inc.
  470 评论
  点赞
  分享
  举报
- XestarXestar
  ·2021-05-10
  Like & comment pls
  非常抱歉，此主贴已删除
  392 1
  4
  分享
  举报
- XestarXestar
  ·2021-04-30
  👍👍👍👍👍
  The stock market will survive Biden
  Most of President Biden’s big proposals are now on the table, and stock market investors have conclu
  The stock market will survive Biden
  712 2
  点赞
  分享
  举报
- XestarXestar
  ·2021-04-29
  Nice !
  Starbucks rallies as analysts talk up long-term potential
  Starbucks(SBUX+1.9%)is gaining back ground as analysts point to more upside potential for the coffee
  Starbucks rallies as analysts talk up long-term potential
  448 评论
  1
  分享
  举报
暂无关注

热议股票

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"isCurrentUser":false,"userPageInfo":{"id":"3577228982706680","uuid":"3577228982706680","gmtCreate":1614134959497,"gmtModify":1619755425862,"name":"Xestar","pinyin":"xestar","introduction":"","introductionEn":null,"signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d87dc57a2a83d0d3f4131dfb312c9faf","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":3,"headSize":87,"tweetSize":6,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":0,"name":"","nameTw":"","represent":"","factor":"","iconColor":"","bgColor":""},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":1,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":null,"userBadges":[{"badgeId":"228c86a078844d74991fff2b7ab2428d-1","templateUuid":"228c86a078844d74991fff2b7ab2428d","name":"投资经理虎","description":"证券账户累计交易金额达到10万美元","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c8dfc27c1ee0e25db1c93e9d0b641101","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f43908c142f8a33c78f5bdf0e2897488","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/82165ff19cb8a786e8919f92acee5213","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.07.14","exceedPercentage":"60.13%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1101},{"badgeId":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561-1","templateUuid":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561","name":"出道虎友","description":"加入老虎社区500天","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0e4d0ca1da0456dc7894c946d44bf9ab","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0f2f65e8ce4cfaae8db2bea9b127f58b","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5948a31b6edf154422335b265235809","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.07.15","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37-1","templateUuid":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37","name":"博闻投资者","description":"累计交易超过10只正股","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},{"badgeId":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a-1","templateUuid":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a","name":"实盘交易者","description":"完成一笔实盘交易","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969-2","templateUuid":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969","name":"宗师交易员","description":"证券或期货账户累计交易次数达到100次","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad22cfbe2d05aa393b18e9226e4b0307","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/36702e6ff3ffe46acafee66cc85273ca","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d52eb88fa385cf5abe2616ed63781765","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":"80.58%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":5,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":"未知","starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"page":1,"watchlist":null,"tweetList":[{"id":148371680,"gmtCreate":1625945361540,"gmtModify":1631890901315,"author":{"id":"3577228982706680","authorId":"3577228982706680","name":"Xestar","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d87dc57a2a83d0d3f4131dfb312c9faf","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577228982706680","authorIdStr":"3577228982706680"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"GL","listText":"GL","text":"GL","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/148371680","repostId":"2150306047","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":256,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":120368188,"gmtCreate":1624300995944,"gmtModify":1631890901327,"author":{"id":"3577228982706680","authorId":"3577228982706680","name":"Xestar","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d87dc57a2a83d0d3f4131dfb312c9faf","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577228982706680","authorIdStr":"3577228982706680"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[微笑]&nbsp;","listText":"[微笑]&nbsp;","text":"[微笑]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/120368188","repostId":"1146982088","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1146982088","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1624259620,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1146982088?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-06-21 15:13","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Powell Just Launched $2 Trillion In \"Heat-Seeking Missiles\": Zoltan Explains How The Fed Started The Next Repo Crisis","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1146982088","media":"zerohedge","summary":"Last week, amid thefire and brimstone surroundingthe market's shocked response to the Fed's unexpect","content":"<p>Last week, amid thefire and brimstone surroundingthe market's shocked response to the Fed's unexpected hawkish pivot, we noted that there were two tangible, if less noted changes: the Fed adjusted the two key \"administered\" rates, raising both the IOER and RRP rates by 5 basis points (as correctly predicted by Bank of America, JPMorgan, Wrightson, Deutsche Bank and Wells Fargo while Citi, Oxford Economics, Jefferies, Credit Suisse, Standard Chartered, BMO were wrong in predicting no rate change), in an effort to push the Effective Fed Funds rate higher and away from its imminent rendezvous with 0%.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/31e3c93e7ae558cd9f2fdb7e4a2769f1\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"377\">What does this mean? As Curvature Securities repo guru,Scott Skyrm wrote last week, \"clearly the Fed intends to move overnight rates above zero and drain the RRP&nbsp; facility of cash.\" Unfortunately, the end result would be precisely the opposite of what the Fed had wanted to achieve.</p>\n<p>But what does this really mean for overnight rates and RRP volume? As Skyrm further noted, the increase in the IOER should pull the daily fed funds rate 5 basis points higher and, in turn, put upward pressure on Repo GC. Combined with the 5 basis point increase in RRP, GC should move a solid 5 basis points higher, which it has.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e8b99df7af1731b4bdcbcf072dcf39ce\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"272\">The problem, as Skyrm warned, is that the Fed's technical adjustment would do nothing to ease the RRP volume:</p>\n<blockquote>\n When market Repo rates were at 0% and the RRP rate was at zero, ~$500 billion went into the RRP. Well, if both market Repo rates and the RRP rate are 5 basis points higher, there's no reason to pull cash out of the RRP. For example, if GC rates moved to .05% and the RRP rate stayed at zero, investor preferences to invest at a higher rate would remove cash from the RRP.\n</blockquote>\n<p>Bottom line: with both market rates and RRP at .05%, there's really no economic incentive for cash investors to move cash to the Repo market. Or, as we summarized, \"<i>the Fed's rate change may have zero impact on the Fed's reverse repo facility, or the record half a trillion in cash parked there.\"</i></p>\n<p>In retrospect, boy was that an understatement, because just one day later the already record usage of the Fed's Reverse Repo facility spiked by a record 50%, exploding to a staggering $756 billion (it closed Friday at $747 billion) as the GSEs.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0fba18d7808300abc3bdf4ffaa3d5fb6\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"273\">Needless to say, flooding the Fed's RRP facility and sterilizing reserves is hardly what the Fed had intended, and as Credit Suisse's own repo guru (and former NY Fed staffer) Zoltan Pozsar wrote in his post-mortem, \"<b>the re-priced RRP facility will become a problem for the banking system fast:</b><b><u>the banking system is going from being asset constrained (deposits flooding in, but nowhere to lend them but to the Fed), to being liability constrained (deposits slipping away and nowhere to replace them but in the money market</u></b><b>).\"</b></p>\n<p>What he means by that is that whereas previously the RRP rate of 0.00% did not<i>reward</i>allocation of inert, excess reserves but merely provided a place to park them, now that the Fed is providing a generous yield pick up compared to rates offered by trillions in Bills, we are about to see a sea-change in the overnight, money-market, as trillions in capital reallocate away from traditional investments and into the the Fed's RRP.</p>\n<p>In other words, as Pozsar puts it, \"the RRP facility started to sterilize reserves... with more to come.\" And just as Deutsche Bank explained why the Fed's signaling was an r* policy error, to Pozsar, the Fed<i><b>also</b></i>made a policy error - only this time with its technical rates - by steriling reserves because \"it’s one thing to raise the rate on the RRP facility when an increase was not strictly speaking necessary, and it’s another to raise it “unduly” high – as one money fund manager put it, “<b>yesterday we could not even get a basis points a year; to get endless paper at five basis points from the most trusted counterparty is a dream come true.\"</b></p>\n<p>He's right: while 0bps may have been viewed by many as too low, it was hardly catastrophic for now (Credit Suisse was one of those predicting no administered rate hike),<b>5bps is too generous</b>, according to Pozsar who warns that the new reverse repo rate<b>will upset the state of \"singularity\"</b>and \"like heat-seeking missiles, money market investors move hundreds of billions, making sharp, 90º turns hunting for even a basis point of yield at the zero bound –<b>at 5 bps, money funds have an incentive to trade out of all their Treasury bills and park cash at the RRP facility.\"</b></p>\n<p>Indeed, as shown below, bills yield less than 5 bps out to 6 months,<b>and money funds have over $2 trillion of bills.</b>They got an the incentive to sell, while others have the incentive to buy: institutions whose deposits have been “tolerated” by banks until now earning zero interest have an incentive to harvest the 0-5 bps range the bill curve has to offer. Putting your cash at a basis point in bills is better than deposits at zero.<b>So the sterilization of reserves begins, and so the o/n RRP facility turns from a largely passive tool that provided an interest rate floor to the deposits that large banks have been pushing away, into an active tool that \"sucks\" the deposits away that banks decided to retain.</b></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bf593f7b1d2d665f39384ed6a998d3bf\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"403\">To help readers visualize what is going on, the Credit Suisse strategist suggest the following \"extreme\" thought experiment: most of the “Covid-19” deposits currently with banks go into the bill market where rates are better. Money funds sell bills to institutional investors that currently keep their cash at banks, and money funds swap bills for o/n RRPs. Said (somewhat) simply, while previously the Fed provided banks with a convenient place to park reserves, it now will actively drain reserves to the point where we may end up with another 2019-style repo crisis, as most financial institutions suddenly find themsleves with<i><b>too few</b></i>intraday reserves, forcing them to use the Fed's other funding facilities (such as FX swap lines) to remain consistently solvent.</p>\n<p>This process is not overnight. It will take a few weeks to observe the fallout from the Fed's reserve sterilization.</p>\n<p>And here is why the problem is similar to the repo crisis of 2019: soon we will find that while cash-rich banks can handle the outflows,<b>some bond-heavy banks cannot.</b>As a result, Zoltan predicts that next \"we will notice that some banks (those who can<i><b>not</b></i>handle outflows) are borrowing advances from FHLBs, and cash-rich banks stop lending in the FX swap market as the RRP facility pulled reserves away from them and the Fed has to re-start the FX swap lines to offset.\"</p>\n<p>Bottom line:<i><b>whereas previously we saw Libor-OIS collapse, this key funding spread will have to widen from here, unless the Fed lowers the o/n RRP rate again back to where it was before.</b></i></p>\n<p>Or, as Zoltan summarizes, \"It’s either quantities or prices\" - indeed,<b>in 2019 the Fed chose prices over quantities, which backfired, and led to the repo crisis which ended the Fed's hiking cycle and started \"NOT QE.\"</b>While the Fed redeemed itself in February, when it expanded the usage of the RRP without making it liability-constrained as it chose quantities over prices - which worked well - last Wednesday,<b>the Fed turned “unlimited” quantities into “money for free” and started to sterilize reserves.</b></p>\n<p>Bottom line: \"we are witnessing the dealer of last resort (DoLR) learning the art of dealing, making unforced errors – if the Fed sterilizes with an overpriced o/n RRP facility, it has to be ready to add liquidity via the swap lines…\"</p>\n<p>Translation:&nbsp;<b>by paying trillions in reserves 5bps, the Fed just planted the seeds of the next liquidity crisis.</b></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Powell Just Launched $2 Trillion In \"Heat-Seeking Missiles\": Zoltan Explains How The Fed Started The Next Repo Crisis</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nPowell Just Launched $2 Trillion In \"Heat-Seeking Missiles\": Zoltan Explains How The Fed Started The Next Repo Crisis\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-21 15:13 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/powell-just-launched-2-trillion-heat-seeking-missiles-zoltan-explains-how-fed-started-next><strong>zerohedge</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Last week, amid thefire and brimstone surroundingthe market's shocked response to the Fed's unexpected hawkish pivot, we noted that there were two tangible, if less noted changes: the Fed adjusted the...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/powell-just-launched-2-trillion-heat-seeking-missiles-zoltan-explains-how-fed-started-next\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","SPY":"标普500ETF",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/powell-just-launched-2-trillion-heat-seeking-missiles-zoltan-explains-how-fed-started-next","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1146982088","content_text":"Last week, amid thefire and brimstone surroundingthe market's shocked response to the Fed's unexpected hawkish pivot, we noted that there were two tangible, if less noted changes: the Fed adjusted the two key \"administered\" rates, raising both the IOER and RRP rates by 5 basis points (as correctly predicted by Bank of America, JPMorgan, Wrightson, Deutsche Bank and Wells Fargo while Citi, Oxford Economics, Jefferies, Credit Suisse, Standard Chartered, BMO were wrong in predicting no rate change), in an effort to push the Effective Fed Funds rate higher and away from its imminent rendezvous with 0%.\nWhat does this mean? As Curvature Securities repo guru,Scott Skyrm wrote last week, \"clearly the Fed intends to move overnight rates above zero and drain the RRP  facility of cash.\" Unfortunately, the end result would be precisely the opposite of what the Fed had wanted to achieve.\nBut what does this really mean for overnight rates and RRP volume? As Skyrm further noted, the increase in the IOER should pull the daily fed funds rate 5 basis points higher and, in turn, put upward pressure on Repo GC. Combined with the 5 basis point increase in RRP, GC should move a solid 5 basis points higher, which it has.\nThe problem, as Skyrm warned, is that the Fed's technical adjustment would do nothing to ease the RRP volume:\n\n When market Repo rates were at 0% and the RRP rate was at zero, ~$500 billion went into the RRP. Well, if both market Repo rates and the RRP rate are 5 basis points higher, there's no reason to pull cash out of the RRP. For example, if GC rates moved to .05% and the RRP rate stayed at zero, investor preferences to invest at a higher rate would remove cash from the RRP.\n\nBottom line: with both market rates and RRP at .05%, there's really no economic incentive for cash investors to move cash to the Repo market. Or, as we summarized, \"the Fed's rate change may have zero impact on the Fed's reverse repo facility, or the record half a trillion in cash parked there.\"\nIn retrospect, boy was that an understatement, because just one day later the already record usage of the Fed's Reverse Repo facility spiked by a record 50%, exploding to a staggering $756 billion (it closed Friday at $747 billion) as the GSEs.\nNeedless to say, flooding the Fed's RRP facility and sterilizing reserves is hardly what the Fed had intended, and as Credit Suisse's own repo guru (and former NY Fed staffer) Zoltan Pozsar wrote in his post-mortem, \"the re-priced RRP facility will become a problem for the banking system fast:the banking system is going from being asset constrained (deposits flooding in, but nowhere to lend them but to the Fed), to being liability constrained (deposits slipping away and nowhere to replace them but in the money market).\"\nWhat he means by that is that whereas previously the RRP rate of 0.00% did notrewardallocation of inert, excess reserves but merely provided a place to park them, now that the Fed is providing a generous yield pick up compared to rates offered by trillions in Bills, we are about to see a sea-change in the overnight, money-market, as trillions in capital reallocate away from traditional investments and into the the Fed's RRP.\nIn other words, as Pozsar puts it, \"the RRP facility started to sterilize reserves... with more to come.\" And just as Deutsche Bank explained why the Fed's signaling was an r* policy error, to Pozsar, the Fedalsomade a policy error - only this time with its technical rates - by steriling reserves because \"it’s one thing to raise the rate on the RRP facility when an increase was not strictly speaking necessary, and it’s another to raise it “unduly” high – as one money fund manager put it, “yesterday we could not even get a basis points a year; to get endless paper at five basis points from the most trusted counterparty is a dream come true.\"\nHe's right: while 0bps may have been viewed by many as too low, it was hardly catastrophic for now (Credit Suisse was one of those predicting no administered rate hike),5bps is too generous, according to Pozsar who warns that the new reverse repo ratewill upset the state of \"singularity\"and \"like heat-seeking missiles, money market investors move hundreds of billions, making sharp, 90º turns hunting for even a basis point of yield at the zero bound –at 5 bps, money funds have an incentive to trade out of all their Treasury bills and park cash at the RRP facility.\"\nIndeed, as shown below, bills yield less than 5 bps out to 6 months,and money funds have over $2 trillion of bills.They got an the incentive to sell, while others have the incentive to buy: institutions whose deposits have been “tolerated” by banks until now earning zero interest have an incentive to harvest the 0-5 bps range the bill curve has to offer. Putting your cash at a basis point in bills is better than deposits at zero.So the sterilization of reserves begins, and so the o/n RRP facility turns from a largely passive tool that provided an interest rate floor to the deposits that large banks have been pushing away, into an active tool that \"sucks\" the deposits away that banks decided to retain.\nTo help readers visualize what is going on, the Credit Suisse strategist suggest the following \"extreme\" thought experiment: most of the “Covid-19” deposits currently with banks go into the bill market where rates are better. Money funds sell bills to institutional investors that currently keep their cash at banks, and money funds swap bills for o/n RRPs. Said (somewhat) simply, while previously the Fed provided banks with a convenient place to park reserves, it now will actively drain reserves to the point where we may end up with another 2019-style repo crisis, as most financial institutions suddenly find themsleves withtoo fewintraday reserves, forcing them to use the Fed's other funding facilities (such as FX swap lines) to remain consistently solvent.\nThis process is not overnight. It will take a few weeks to observe the fallout from the Fed's reserve sterilization.\nAnd here is why the problem is similar to the repo crisis of 2019: soon we will find that while cash-rich banks can handle the outflows,some bond-heavy banks cannot.As a result, Zoltan predicts that next \"we will notice that some banks (those who cannothandle outflows) are borrowing advances from FHLBs, and cash-rich banks stop lending in the FX swap market as the RRP facility pulled reserves away from them and the Fed has to re-start the FX swap lines to offset.\"\nBottom line:whereas previously we saw Libor-OIS collapse, this key funding spread will have to widen from here, unless the Fed lowers the o/n RRP rate again back to where it was before.\nOr, as Zoltan summarizes, \"It’s either quantities or prices\" - indeed,in 2019 the Fed chose prices over quantities, which backfired, and led to the repo crisis which ended the Fed's hiking cycle and started \"NOT QE.\"While the Fed redeemed itself in February, when it expanded the usage of the RRP without making it liability-constrained as it chose quantities over prices - which worked well - last Wednesday,the Fed turned “unlimited” quantities into “money for free” and started to sterilize reserves.\nBottom line: \"we are witnessing the dealer of last resort (DoLR) learning the art of dealing, making unforced errors – if the Fed sterilizes with an overpriced o/n RRP facility, it has to be ready to add liquidity via the swap lines…\"\nTranslation: by paying trillions in reserves 5bps, the Fed just planted the seeds of the next liquidity crisis.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":869,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":166623913,"gmtCreate":1624007065133,"gmtModify":1631890901341,"author":{"id":"3577228982706680","authorId":"3577228982706680","name":"Xestar","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d87dc57a2a83d0d3f4131dfb312c9faf","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577228982706680","authorIdStr":"3577228982706680"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wow o.0","listText":"Wow o.0","text":"Wow o.0","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/166623913","repostId":"1107863941","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1107863941","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1624004900,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1107863941?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-06-18 16:28","market":"us","language":"en","title":"CAI shares soared nearly 45% in pre-market，as it has agreed to a $1.1 billion takeover by Mitsubishi HC Capital Inc.","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1107863941","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"CAI shares soared nearly 45% in pre-market，as it has agreed to a $1.1 billion takeover by Mitsubishi","content":"<p>CAI&nbsp;shares&nbsp;soared&nbsp;nearly&nbsp;45% in pre-market，as&nbsp;it has agreed to a $1.1 billion takeover by Mitsubishi HC Capital Inc.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a2922db8924ea9786a2bc69ae8bfc166\" tg-width=\"1289\" tg-height=\"605\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">The deal consists of $104 million worth of preferred stock and $986 million of common stock equity value, and has an enterprise value of $2.9 billion, CAI said on Thursday.</p>\n<p>Mitsubishi HC Capital has offered $56 per share in cash according to the company's statement, marking a 46.8% premium over CAI's last closing price.</p>\n<p>The deal has been unanimously approved by CAI's board of directors, the company said, adding that shares of CAI will no longer be listed on the New York Stock Exchange after the deal is completed.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>CAI shares soared nearly 45% in pre-market，as it has agreed to a $1.1 billion takeover by Mitsubishi HC Capital Inc.</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nCAI shares soared nearly 45% in pre-market，as it has agreed to a $1.1 billion takeover by Mitsubishi HC Capital Inc.\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-06-18 16:28</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>CAI&nbsp;shares&nbsp;soared&nbsp;nearly&nbsp;45% in pre-market，as&nbsp;it has agreed to a $1.1 billion takeover by Mitsubishi HC Capital Inc.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a2922db8924ea9786a2bc69ae8bfc166\" tg-width=\"1289\" tg-height=\"605\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">The deal consists of $104 million worth of preferred stock and $986 million of common stock equity value, and has an enterprise value of $2.9 billion, CAI said on Thursday.</p>\n<p>Mitsubishi HC Capital has offered $56 per share in cash according to the company's statement, marking a 46.8% premium over CAI's last closing price.</p>\n<p>The deal has been unanimously approved by CAI's board of directors, the company said, adding that shares of CAI will no longer be listed on the New York Stock Exchange after the deal is completed.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1107863941","content_text":"CAI shares soared nearly 45% in pre-market，as it has agreed to a $1.1 billion takeover by Mitsubishi HC Capital Inc.\nThe deal consists of $104 million worth of preferred stock and $986 million of common stock equity value, and has an enterprise value of $2.9 billion, CAI said on Thursday.\nMitsubishi HC Capital has offered $56 per share in cash according to the company's statement, marking a 46.8% premium over CAI's last closing price.\nThe deal has been unanimously approved by CAI's board of directors, the company said, adding that shares of CAI will no longer be listed on the New York Stock Exchange after the deal is completed.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":470,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":190868547,"gmtCreate":1620611353789,"gmtModify":1631890901350,"author":{"id":"3577228982706680","authorId":"3577228982706680","name":"Xestar","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d87dc57a2a83d0d3f4131dfb312c9faf","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577228982706680","authorIdStr":"3577228982706680"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like &amp; comment pls","listText":"Like &amp; comment pls","text":"Like & comment pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/190868547","repostId":"2134686276","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":392,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":103892491,"gmtCreate":1619763530113,"gmtModify":1631890901362,"author":{"id":"3577228982706680","authorId":"3577228982706680","name":"Xestar","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d87dc57a2a83d0d3f4131dfb312c9faf","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577228982706680","authorIdStr":"3577228982706680"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍👍👍👍👍","listText":"👍👍👍👍👍","text":"👍👍👍👍👍","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/103892491","repostId":"1132941458","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1132941458","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1619761544,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1132941458?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-04-30 13:45","market":"us","language":"en","title":"The stock market will survive Biden","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1132941458","media":"Yahoo Finance","summary":"Most of President Biden’s big proposals are now on the table, and stock market investors have conclu","content":"<p>Most of&nbsp;President Biden’s&nbsp;big proposals&nbsp;are&nbsp;now&nbsp;on the table, and stock market investors have concluded everything will be okay.</p><p>They won’t necessarily say that. Big battles are underway over raising the&nbsp;corporate tax rate, the&nbsp;capital gains tax rate&nbsp;for&nbsp;millionaires&nbsp;and the top income tax bracket. CEOs and some economists insist higher taxes on business activity and investing will depress both, with some workers ultimately losing out because of slower job growth or weaker income gains. They may even turn out to be right. But the evidence now suggests none of this will harm stocks.</p><p>The clearest sign of this is the market itself. The day after&nbsp;Biden unveiled&nbsp;his American Family Plan—and the tax hikes he wants to pay for nearly $2 trillion in social-welfare spending—the&nbsp;S&amp;P 500 and NASDAQ stock indexes hit record highs. They weren’t necessarily cheering for Biden’s plans, and were mostly driven upward by earnings news. But that’s good: Markets functioning normally, without political interference messing things up.</p><p>Three factors are reassuring investors. First, Congress is unlikely to pass the exact&nbsp;tax hikes Biden&nbsp;is asking for. Biden wants to&nbsp;raise the corporate tax rate&nbsp;from 21% to 28%, but Congress will probably only go as far as 25%. The corporate rate used to be 35%, and&nbsp;stocks still went up&nbsp;most of the time, so a 25% rate seems relatively benign.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bb2962cb21929eceffa0859f33ca627d\" tg-width=\"808\" tg-height=\"666\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>Biden is calling for a raising the capital gains rate from 23.8% to 43.4% for investors earning more than $1 million. He won’t get that either, with a more likely outcome being a top rate of 28% to 30%. Congress probably will raise the top income tax rate from 37% to 39.6%, as Biden wants, but this would only affect about 1% of taxpayers.</p><p>Even the smaller tax hikes would cut into corporate profits and reduce the return on investing, so wouldn’t that hurt stock values? Maybe a little, but all the spending Biden wants to do would probably have a stimulative effect, more than offsetting the contracting effect of tax hikes. Infrastructure build-outs in particular tend to have a positive return in the long term, since they make the economy more efficient and productive. Businesses benefit the most.</p><p>Moody’s Analytics analyzed the Biden infrastructure plan and forecast it would boost GDP growth by 1.5 percentage points by 2024. There would be 2.4 million additional jobs. By the end of the decade, productivity growth—the key to boosting living standards—would be stronger. Other studies find a&nbsp;smaller or even negative economic impact&nbsp;from Biden’s plans, but changes would be so distant the market doesn’t seem to care. And that would be if all the Biden tax hikes went into account, not a Biden-lite package watered down by Congress.</p><p>A third reason investors aren’t worried about the Biden tax hikes is they wouldn’t necessarily change the incentive for investors to buy stocks. While the capital gains tax hike would, in fact, lower returns to wealthy American investors, only about&nbsp;30% of publicly owned stock is held by taxable entities, such as individuals subject to the capital gains tax. And less than that is owned by investors with incomes of $1 million or more. The rest is held foreign investors or by institutions such as retirement plans and life insurance companies, and none of those would be subject to Biden’s capital gains tax hike. So the portion of tax subject to the higher capital gains tax would be small.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ef1c6e3b45bda56920c20f93b2ceb690\" tg-width=\"683\" tg-height=\"692\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>Some of those investors probably would sell before the higher rates went into effect, to lock in the gain at a lower tax rate (provided Congress doesn’t make this tax hike retroactive). Some analysts think this would trigger a market correction. But Leonard Burman of the Tax Policy Center argues that any price dip would be a&nbsp;buying opportunity for all the other stock-market investors, who would gobble up shares at a temporary discount, promptly ending any selloff. And if capital gains tax rates are higher, another argument goes, it gives more incentive for people in the market to hold onto their investments.</p><p>There’s a fourth factor unrelated to Biden, which is the Federal Reserve. The Fed’s&nbsp;easy-money policy&nbsp;has probably goosed stocks more than anything else, one huge reason for the remarkable 83% run-up in stocks since the market bottomed out last year. The Fed says it will keep the party going at least into 2022, and then tighten up only gradually. The Fed isn’t doing this for Biden, but the Fed backstop probably gives Biden more margin for error.</p><p>None of this guarantees stocks will avoid a correction or even stay positive for the rest of the year. But it strongly suggests there won’t be a plunging stock market screaming at Biden to stop raising taxes. Others might scream, but without the market’s endorsement.</p>","source":"yahoofinance_sg","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>The stock market will survive Biden</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThe stock market will survive Biden\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-04-30 13:45 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/the-stock-market-will-survive-biden-203054481.html><strong>Yahoo Finance</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Most of President Biden’s big proposals are now on the table, and stock market investors have concluded everything will be okay.They won’t necessarily say that. Big battles are underway over raising ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/the-stock-market-will-survive-biden-203054481.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/the-stock-market-will-survive-biden-203054481.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1132941458","content_text":"Most of President Biden’s big proposals are now on the table, and stock market investors have concluded everything will be okay.They won’t necessarily say that. Big battles are underway over raising the corporate tax rate, the capital gains tax rate for millionaires and the top income tax bracket. CEOs and some economists insist higher taxes on business activity and investing will depress both, with some workers ultimately losing out because of slower job growth or weaker income gains. They may even turn out to be right. But the evidence now suggests none of this will harm stocks.The clearest sign of this is the market itself. The day after Biden unveiled his American Family Plan—and the tax hikes he wants to pay for nearly $2 trillion in social-welfare spending—the S&P 500 and NASDAQ stock indexes hit record highs. They weren’t necessarily cheering for Biden’s plans, and were mostly driven upward by earnings news. But that’s good: Markets functioning normally, without political interference messing things up.Three factors are reassuring investors. First, Congress is unlikely to pass the exact tax hikes Biden is asking for. Biden wants to raise the corporate tax rate from 21% to 28%, but Congress will probably only go as far as 25%. The corporate rate used to be 35%, and stocks still went up most of the time, so a 25% rate seems relatively benign.Biden is calling for a raising the capital gains rate from 23.8% to 43.4% for investors earning more than $1 million. He won’t get that either, with a more likely outcome being a top rate of 28% to 30%. Congress probably will raise the top income tax rate from 37% to 39.6%, as Biden wants, but this would only affect about 1% of taxpayers.Even the smaller tax hikes would cut into corporate profits and reduce the return on investing, so wouldn’t that hurt stock values? Maybe a little, but all the spending Biden wants to do would probably have a stimulative effect, more than offsetting the contracting effect of tax hikes. Infrastructure build-outs in particular tend to have a positive return in the long term, since they make the economy more efficient and productive. Businesses benefit the most.Moody’s Analytics analyzed the Biden infrastructure plan and forecast it would boost GDP growth by 1.5 percentage points by 2024. There would be 2.4 million additional jobs. By the end of the decade, productivity growth—the key to boosting living standards—would be stronger. Other studies find a smaller or even negative economic impact from Biden’s plans, but changes would be so distant the market doesn’t seem to care. And that would be if all the Biden tax hikes went into account, not a Biden-lite package watered down by Congress.A third reason investors aren’t worried about the Biden tax hikes is they wouldn’t necessarily change the incentive for investors to buy stocks. While the capital gains tax hike would, in fact, lower returns to wealthy American investors, only about 30% of publicly owned stock is held by taxable entities, such as individuals subject to the capital gains tax. And less than that is owned by investors with incomes of $1 million or more. The rest is held foreign investors or by institutions such as retirement plans and life insurance companies, and none of those would be subject to Biden’s capital gains tax hike. So the portion of tax subject to the higher capital gains tax would be small.Some of those investors probably would sell before the higher rates went into effect, to lock in the gain at a lower tax rate (provided Congress doesn’t make this tax hike retroactive). Some analysts think this would trigger a market correction. But Leonard Burman of the Tax Policy Center argues that any price dip would be a buying opportunity for all the other stock-market investors, who would gobble up shares at a temporary discount, promptly ending any selloff. And if capital gains tax rates are higher, another argument goes, it gives more incentive for people in the market to hold onto their investments.There’s a fourth factor unrelated to Biden, which is the Federal Reserve. The Fed’s easy-money policy has probably goosed stocks more than anything else, one huge reason for the remarkable 83% run-up in stocks since the market bottomed out last year. The Fed says it will keep the party going at least into 2022, and then tighten up only gradually. The Fed isn’t doing this for Biden, but the Fed backstop probably gives Biden more margin for error.None of this guarantees stocks will avoid a correction or even stay positive for the rest of the year. But it strongly suggests there won’t be a plunging stock market screaming at Biden to stop raising taxes. Others might scream, but without the market’s endorsement.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":712,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":109438092,"gmtCreate":1619708688716,"gmtModify":1631890901374,"author":{"id":"3577228982706680","authorId":"3577228982706680","name":"Xestar","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d87dc57a2a83d0d3f4131dfb312c9faf","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577228982706680","authorIdStr":"3577228982706680"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nice !","listText":"Nice !","text":"Nice !","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/109438092","repostId":"1148997431","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1148997431","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1619707843,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1148997431?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-04-29 22:50","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Starbucks rallies as analysts talk up long-term potential","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1148997431","media":"seekingalpha","summary":"Starbucks(SBUX+1.9%)is gaining back ground as analysts point to more upside potential for the coffee","content":"<p>Starbucks(SBUX+1.9%)is gaining back ground as analysts point to more upside potential for the coffee chain juggernaut.</p>\n<p>BTIG still sees upside for Starbucks even after the company posted what it says was a stellar quarter.</p>\n<p>Analyst Peter Saleh (Buy rating on SBUX, PT of $130): \"While comps in China were slightly below expectations owing to some mobility/travel restrictions following COVID resurgence, domestic sales continued to improve with the easiest full quarter comparisons still ahead. We believe Starbucks could continue to top EPS expectations given the sales recovery in the U.S., near full recovery in China and margin benefits from the trade area transformation... we still see opportunity for upside.\"</p>\n<p>Cowen says Starbucks is still its favorite restaurant reopening pick.</p>\n<p>Analyst Andrew Charles (Outperform, $126 PT): \"SBUX has returned to beat &amp; raise mode, and we believe there is cushion within guidance for beats &amp; raises to continue. Given SBUX's forward P/E ratio pre-COVID-19 had a +0.86 correlation with Americas same store sales, we see room for multiple expansion based on confidence in the U.S. recovery that should overshadow a potentially bumpier int'l recovery.\"</p>\n<p>Read what Starbucks management said about the outlook for 2021on the earnings conference call.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Starbucks rallies as analysts talk up long-term potential</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nStarbucks rallies as analysts talk up long-term potential\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-04-29 22:50 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/news/3687972-starbucks-rallies-as-analysts-talk-up-long-term-potential><strong>seekingalpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Starbucks(SBUX+1.9%)is gaining back ground as analysts point to more upside potential for the coffee chain juggernaut.\nBTIG still sees upside for Starbucks even after the company posted what it says ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/news/3687972-starbucks-rallies-as-analysts-talk-up-long-term-potential\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SBUX":"星巴克"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/news/3687972-starbucks-rallies-as-analysts-talk-up-long-term-potential","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1148997431","content_text":"Starbucks(SBUX+1.9%)is gaining back ground as analysts point to more upside potential for the coffee chain juggernaut.\nBTIG still sees upside for Starbucks even after the company posted what it says was a stellar quarter.\nAnalyst Peter Saleh (Buy rating on SBUX, PT of $130): \"While comps in China were slightly below expectations owing to some mobility/travel restrictions following COVID resurgence, domestic sales continued to improve with the easiest full quarter comparisons still ahead. We believe Starbucks could continue to top EPS expectations given the sales recovery in the U.S., near full recovery in China and margin benefits from the trade area transformation... we still see opportunity for upside.\"\nCowen says Starbucks is still its favorite restaurant reopening pick.\nAnalyst Andrew Charles (Outperform, $126 PT): \"SBUX has returned to beat & raise mode, and we believe there is cushion within guidance for beats & raises to continue. Given SBUX's forward P/E ratio pre-COVID-19 had a +0.86 correlation with Americas same store sales, we see room for multiple expansion based on confidence in the U.S. recovery that should overshadow a potentially bumpier int'l recovery.\"\nRead what Starbucks management said about the outlook for 2021on the earnings conference call.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":448,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"defaultTab":"following","isTTM":false}